PracticeQuiz content is free on an ad-supported model.

Unfortunately, we can't support ad blocker usage because of the impact on our servers. If you'd like to continue, please disable your ad blocker and reload page.

Reload page

SPHR Human Resources

Category - Planning

Start a Study Session Sign up for Question of the Day

A defining Supreme Court case for interpreting the Civil Rights Act of 1991 was

Kolstad v. American Dental Association
Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger
St. Mary’s Honor Center v. Hicks
United Steelworkers v. Weber

Explanation

Answer - A - In this case, the court ruled that punitive damages can only be awarded when the employer has acted with malice and reckless indifference to “the employee’s federally protected rights.”

Key Takeaway: Options B, C, and D each address different legal principles.

Was this helpful? Upvote!

Start a Study Session Sign up for Question of the Day

SPHR Human Resources

Top questions

Related questions

Most popular on PracticeQuiz

Ad-Blocker not supported

SPHR Human Resources

Top questions

Related questions

Most popular on PracticeQuiz