Practice Quiz

LSAT

Category - Logical Reasoning

Start a Study Session Sign up for Question of the Day
Letter to the Editor: “Immigration reform is a very serious problem facing our country. Immigration laws are confusing and it is expensive to hire a lawyer. In a recent survey, 60% of Americans favored changing immigration laws. Clearly the laws we have are outdated and are in need of a change.”

Which one of the following most accurately describes a reasoning flaw in the letter’s argument?
  1. The argument’s conclusion is in part based on the opinions of people who have not been shown to have relevant expertise.
  2. The argument fails to establish a valid alternative.
  3. The argument fails to define the precise aspects of the current immigration laws that need to change.
  4. The argument does not explain what is “confusing” about immigration law.
  5. The argument takes for granted that an immigration lawyer is always necessary.
Explanation
Answer: A - The letter’s argument is in part based on the opinions of people who have not been shown to have relevant expertise. The letter writer cites popular opinion, but does not explain why this opinion should matter, and whether people surveyed were properly educated and knowledgeable enough about the subject to give a valid viewpoint.
Previous Next
Was this helpful? Upvote!
Login to contribute your own answer or details
Start a Study Session Sign up for Question of the Day

Top questions

Related questions

Most popular on PracticeQuiz