LSAT

Category - Logical Reasoning

Each and every time Joel goes to the grocery store, he buys bananas, apples, and bread. When his wife Katie arrived home from work, she saw bananas, apples, and bread on the kitchen counter and knew that Joel had done the shopping.

Katie’s flawed reasoning in the passage is most similar to which of the following statements?
  1. Emily always brings a pie to any potluck event she attends. Elena invited Emily to her potluck dinner because she knew that Emily would bring a delicious pie.
  2. Emily usually brings a pie to any potluck event she attends. For tomorrow's banquet, Emily will probably bring a pumpkin pie.
  3. Emily always brings a pie to any potluck event she attends. When Elena arrived at the potluck dinner, she saw an apple pie on the table and knew that Emily must have attended.
  4. Emily always brings a pie to any potluck event she attends. When Elena arrived at the potluck dinner, she saw Emily and knew that they would be having pie for dessert.
  5. Emily never brings a salad to a potluck. When Elena invited her to a potluck party, she knew that Emily would be bringing a dessert.
Explanation
Answer: C - Katie’s flawed reasoning is most similar to that in answer C. In the original passage, Katie thought she knew that Joel had gone shopping because she saw bananas, apples, and bread, since Joel always buys those items when he goes shopping. However, she did not know that Joel had gone shopping; she only knew that the food had arrived. This is most similar to C, in which Elena knows that Emily always brings a pie, and assumes Emily is there when she sees a pie, even though the pie could have been brought by someone else.
Was this helpful? Upvote!
Login to contribute your own answer or details

Top questions

Related questions

Most popular on PracticeQuiz