"It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. . . . A law repugnant to the constitution is void."

In Marbury v. Madison (1803), quoted above, the Supreme Court argued that it had the authority to:

  1. overturn laws it found unconstitutional
  2. overturn previous court decisions
  3. grant Presidents special powers in times of crisis
  4. make laws
Explanation

Answer: A - overturn laws it found unconstitutional.

Was this helpful? Upvote!
Login to contribute your own answer or details

Top questions

Related questions

Most popular on PracticeQuiz