Child Psychology Exam Prep

Category - Child Psychology

In the practice of clinical psychology, which of the following would not be considered a serious violation of mandated professional conduct, demanding immediate supervisory attention?
  1. A therapist who forgot to get informed consent before turning on the tape recording during therapy.
  2. A therapist who was more successful than anyone else on staff in procuring participants for a research study, but admitted to overstating the ensuing benefits for the participants.
  3. A therapist who spun the published article of another psychologist, then had his rewritten version published in a different journal with himself as the author.
  4. A therapist who submitted his research findings to a professional journal for publication, then realized a methodological flaw and submitted a second article retracting the conclusions drawn from the study.
Explanation
Answer: D - Conducting a methodologically-flawed study, and admitting afterwards that the conclusions were premature because of those methodological flaws, while hardly an activity to encourage in a psychologist, at least shows some responsibility is being taken. Supervisory guidance to minimize sloppy methodology in the future should be helpful, but dealing with this non-violation of the Ethics Code is less urgent than dealing with behavior that is deliberately deceptive like misrepresenting benefits to research participants. Likewise, when a therapist “forgets” to ask for the patient’s permission to record his statements during therapy, it could be because the therapist wants the recording but does not expect to receive permission from the patient.
Was this helpful? Upvote!
Login to contribute your own answer or details

Top questions

Related questions

Most popular on PracticeQuiz