Practice Quiz

LSAT

Category - Logical Reasoning

Start a Study Session Sign up for Question of the Day
To cut costs, a local town stopped adding fluoride to its water supply. After the change, local dentists noticed a 25% rise in their number of patients. Clearly, removing fluoride had negative effects on dental health in the town.

The argument depends on assuming which of the following?
  1. At least some of the dentist visits were due to a decrease in fluoride intake.
  2. Most of the people in the town always drank from the water supply.
  3. Cutting the fluoride supply was an effective way to reduce costs.
  4. A 25% rise is an abnormally high change in the number of dental patients.
  5. Local dentists always keep meticulous records on their numbers of patients.
Explanation
Answer: A - The argument assumes that at least some of the dentist visits were due to a decrease in fluoride intake. The passage links a rise in dentist visits to the cut in fluoride supply. For this link to exist, then at least some of the visits must have been related to a lack of fluoride.
Previous Next
Was this helpful? Upvote!
Login to contribute your own answer or details
Start a Study Session Sign up for Question of the Day

Top questions

Related questions

Most popular on PracticeQuiz