LSAT

Category - Logical Reasoning

Keisha: “The wetlands located on the south side of the football field need to be preserved at any cost. They are an important habitat for many species of birds, and if the wetlands are lost, the environmental impacts will be enormous. Plus, many residents appreciate the peaceful walking trails through the wetlands.”

Bill: “But our town is facing an economic recession. We do not have enough affordable housing, and many areas are becoming crowded. We do not have the economic resources to pay for any maintenance costs for the wetlands, and they could also be turned into an affordable housing unit, which is desperately needed.”

Keisha’s statement most closely agrees with which of the following principles?
  1. The environment should be preserved only when it is economically feasible to do so.
  2. Even if economically costly, environmental protection is important for wildlife as well as for people.
  3. While people do not benefit from environmental protection, it is important to preserve natural spaces for animals.
  4. Environmental protection cannot be a priority in economically trying times.
  5. If environmental concerns need to be weighed against economic concerns, economic concerns should prevail.
Explanation
Answer: B - Keisha’s statement most closely agrees with the principle that even if it is economically costly, environmental protection is important for wildlife as well as for people. Keisha wants to preserve the wetlands given their importance for wildlife as well as the residents’ enjoyment, despite the cost.
Was this helpful? Upvote!
Login to contribute your own answer or details

Top questions

Related questions

Most popular on PracticeQuiz