Practice Quiz

LSAT

Category - Logical Reasoning

Start a Study Session Sign up for Question of the Day
Two scientists designed a study to investigate the impact of a recent sewage spill in a local river. They compared species diversity in the affected river to species diversity in a nearby river not affected by the spill, and found that the species diversity in the two rivers was roughly the same. The researchers concluded that the sewage spill had little to no effect on the health of the affected river.

Each of the following, if true, would undermine the researchers’ conclusion EXCEPT:
  1. Prior to the sewage spill, a study had documented greater species diversity in the affected river than was found in this study.
  2. The control river experienced a similar sewage spill two years ago.
  3. The full damage to an eco-system after a sewage spill can take years, if not decades, to manifest.
  4. A sewage spill tends to affect all species equally.
  5. The two rivers were remarkably similar in all features and were located in the same geographical area.
Explanation
Answer: E - The fact that the two rivers were remarkably similar in all features and were located in the same geographical area would not undermine the researcher's conclusion. The other responses explain how the study could have missed possible effects of the spill (A, C, and D) or that the control was not an appropriate choice (B). Answer E is the only answer that does not propose a potential flaw in the study, and so is the correct answer.
Previous Next
Was this helpful? Upvote!
Login to contribute your own answer or details
Start a Study Session Sign up for Question of the Day

Top questions

Related questions

Most popular on PracticeQuiz