LSAT

Category - Logical Reasoning

There are now far fewer independent hardware shops than there were in previous decades. The growth of large chain stores has forced many independent hardware stores to close, ultimately to the detriment of customers because a great variety of tools only carried in specialty stores are now much harder to find.

Which of the following is an assumption upon which the argument relies?
  1. Chain stores offer better prices but worse selection than independent stores.
  2. Hardware store customers would be better off if they could more easily find a larger variety of tools.
  3. There are more chain stores now than five years ago.
  4. Some hardware store customers value prices more than variety.
  5. Some hardware store customers value variety more than prices.
Explanation
Answer: B - The argument relies upon the assumption that hardware store customers would be better off if they could more easily find a larger variety of tools. The passage asserts that consumers are negatively impacted because the variety of tools once found at independent stores is now harder to find. For this to be true, hardware store customers must be better off if they could find those tools.
Was this helpful? Upvote!
Login to contribute your own answer or details

Top questions

Related questions

Most popular on PracticeQuiz