PracticeQuiz content is free on an ad-supported model.

Unfortunately, we can't support ad blocker usage because of the impact on our servers. If you'd like to continue, please disable your ad blocker and reload page.

Reload page

Forensic Accounting

Category - Fundamental Forensic Knowledge

Start a Study Session Sign up for Question of the Day

Which of the following testimonies is considered more reliable in financial cases?

Expert testimony
Fact testimony
Judgment testimony
All of the above

Explanation

Answer: A - Expert testimonies are more reliable in financial cases. Fact testimony in causation is a better option in a matter of law and judgment. Judgment testimony, on the other hand, is situation-based, and hence, can’t be applied comprehensively throughout.

Was this helpful? Upvote!

Start a Study Session Sign up for Question of the Day

Forensic Accounting

Top questions

Related questions

Most popular on PracticeQuiz

Ad-Blocker not supported

Forensic Accounting

Top questions

Related questions

Most popular on PracticeQuiz