LSAT Exam Prep (Reasoning) - Question List

Select how would you like to study

26. Jan is a paralegal employed by Curley & Moe, a mid-size law firm. Her supervising attorney is Bob. Bob is representing Gil in the sale of the manufacturing division of Gil’s business. Jan is aware that, pursuant to the purchase and sale agreement, Curley & Moe is holding $75,000 in its trust account. Curley & Moe has procedures for handling client money and deposit of fees, and those procedures include using a check request form to obtain checks for payment of funds out of the firm’s trust account. However, all accounts are overseen by a senior partner, and only two senior partners are signatories on the trust account. Under the purchase and sale agreement, the $75,000 can be released to Gil when all assets of the manufacturing division have been transferred to the purchaser. After a month of work, all of the assets have been transferred. Jan’s supervising attorney has asked Jan to submit a check request to the office manager and obtain a check payable to Gil in the amount of $75,000. From the answer choices listed below, what is Jan’s best response?
  1. Call the confidential state bar ethics hotline and ask how she should handle the situation because her supervisor’s request appears to violate the ethics rules.
  2. Prepare the check request according to office procedure, but ask that the check be given directly to her supervising attorney.
  3. Prepare the check request according to office procedure, obtain the check for Gil, and inform her supervising attorney as soon as she has the check.
  4. Decline to prepare the check request and obtain the check unless her supervising attorney shows that she is permitted to handle client funds in this way.
27. Sunrise Travel is a Florida corporation that markets cruises and other vacation packages. It employs 500 people. Sunrise Travel’s Articles of Incorporation state that all employees are considered at-will employees, except for the President and other officers appointed by the Board of Directors. Mr. Hernandez is the President of Sunrise Travel. Sunrise Travel’s Human Resources Department issued an employee handbook stating that the rules in the handbook apply to all at-will employees. If a paralegal concluded that the rules of the employee handbook do not apply to Mr. Hernandez, would that conclusion be correct?
  1. Yes, because the President is not considered an at-will employee of Sunrise Travel.
  2. Yes, because Mr. Hernandez is not considered an at-will employee of Sunrise Travel.
  3. No, because being an officer of Sunrise Travel does not preclude application of the handbook.
  4. No, because the handbook was not approved by the Board of Directors.
28. Select the answer choice that correctly completes the following: All human beings are mortal.George is an extraterrestrial.
  1. All human beings are extraterrestrials.
  2. George is not mortal.
  3. George is not a human being.
  4. None of the above.
29. Bigtime Business is a Minnesota corporation that manufactures widgets and employs 500 individuals. Bigtime Business’s Articles of Incorporation state that all employees are considered at-will employees, except for the President and other officers appointed by the Board of Directors. Bigtime Business’s employees formed a union, and all employees joined, but the union agreed in a collective bargaining agreement that the rules in Bigtime Business’s employee handbook apply to all at-will employees. If a paralegal concluded that the rules of the employee handbook applied to Mr. Hernandez, what minor premise is necessary for that conclusion?
  1. The employee handbook was approved by the Board of Directors.
  2. Mr. Hernandez is an at-will employee of Bigtime Business.
  3. Mr. Hernandez is a member of the union formed by Bigtime Business’s employees.
  4. The rules of the employee handbook apply to Mr. Hernandez.
30. Teri is a paralegal who works for a three-attorney law firm. Teri works mainly for Cheryl on family law and custody matters. David is a former client whose divorce was finalized about six months ago. One afternoon when Cheryl was in court, Teri received a call from David. David said that he really liked Cheryl’s work on his case and that he wanted to hire the firm for another matter. David asked if he could drop off a check that afternoon payable to the firm’s trust so that he could “withdraw” the funds at a later time. He said he wasn’t interested in receiving interest on the funds and would pay a reasonable fee for time the funds were in the trust account. From the answer choices listed below, what is Jan’s best response?
  1. Explain to David that a law firm trust account cannot be used to hold funds in the manner described-like a bank-and if he persists, offer to ask Cheryl to return his call.
  2. Agree to accept the check that afternoon for David’s convenience, but explain to David that Cheryl must still agree to hold the funds in the trust account as requested.
  3. Agree to hold the funds in the trust account and accept the check that afternoon because it will facilitate client relations.
  4. Explain to David that holding the funds in the firm’s trust account as requested sounds like money-laundering and that the firm cannot engage in illegal conduct.

Select how would you like to study