SAT Prep - Question List

351. Was Hamlet a Hero?

Hamlet is a literary work that people from all facets of life have at least heard of. This seventeenth century play encompasses the life of Hamlet, the prince of Denmark. His dramatic life is narrated throughout the pages of William Shakespeare’s play. In creating such a work, Shakespeare created a character that had the potential, power, and authority to serve as a hero among his people; nonetheless, this contradictory man seems too distraught to truly embellish and illustrate the definition of a true hero. In brief, Hamlet signifies a persona that is quite different from the typical hero. Rather than being a noble and courageous man, this prince of Denmark is unrepresentative of the admirable qualities that heroes typically reflect. Hamlet’s internal conflicts, selfish behaviors, absence of courage, and eventual surrender to death make him arguably a simple man, unworthy of the title of hero.
Hamlet struggles with immense internal conflicts that create overwhelming and unbearable pain. This madness is displayed in Hamlet’s cruel response to Ophelia, a woman that he has once loved: “I have heard of your paintings well enough / God hath given you one face, / and you make yourselves another, you jig, / you amble, and you lisp,” (III, i ,144-148). Prior to this Hamlet had intentionally pursued Ophelia, but his inability to move beyond his father’s death leaves him struggling to maintain any degree of stability. Throughout the play, others seek to encourage Hamlet, but he maintains distance from those around him, brooding on the past. It is this reluctance to move beyond his father’s death that causes Hamlet to remain entrapped in a sea of internal despair that hinders the role as the hero that his ancestry intended for him to be. Rather than a hero, Hamlet is a man tortured by internal desolation.
Equally important, Hamlet displays inconsistent behaviors that are contradictory to heroism. He hates partying, drinking, and dancing, as he recognizes that these attributes lead to inaction, and says to his friend Horatio: “They clepe us drunkards, and with swinish phrase, /Soil our addition, and indeed it takes, / From our achievements, though perform’d at height,/ The pith and marrow of our attribute,” (I, iv, 19-22). Certainly, the recognition that such actions do hinder progress depicts Hamlet as a wise hero, but this illustration is short-lived when Hamlet uses his strong anger towards his mother (who married his uncle Claudius soon after his father’s demise) as an excuse to reject and deny his lover Ophelia. While there are brief glimmers of heroism revealed in the behaviors of Hamlet, most actions are reflective of his inner turmoil and his inability to truly behave as a hero to those around him.
Compared to the true hero, Hamlet lacks the courage needed to perform selfless actions. Instead, Hamlet is the opposite of courageous, seeking excuses to delay his killing of Claudius, even though he is taunted by reminders of his late father, who appears as a ghost to urge him to avenge his death. While Hamlet reaches the point of hating anything that defines Claudius, he never attains the courage needed to destroy the man that has symbolically destroyed him. If Hamlet were truly a hero, he would find a way to vindicate his father by following the wishes of the ghost that visits him. Instead, Hamlet remains a captive of the murder that he wants to commit but cannot find the courage to do. This is certainly representative of his non-heroic state.
Similarly, Hamlet surrenders in a way that is not indicative of heroism. He feels compelled to surrender his life to destiny. While Hamlet’s ultimate recognition that he has no real control of his own life allows him to gain some resemblance of peace, it is evidence of weakness that does not embody the heroic mindset. Heroes strive for control and supremacy, which is quite the opposite of his inability to act in response to his father’s death. Rather than seeking to reflect knowledge and legacy, he allows himself to be reduced to an individual lacking the knowledge to lead and protect others. It is this absence of knowledge that makes him unable to claim the title of hero. It is Hamlet’s ultimate surrender to the world around him that leads readers to see the extent of how contrary he is to heroism.
In looking at the life of Hamlet, one sees the reflection of a man that has the ancestry, the placement, and the ability to be a hero to his people. Unfortunately, he is encapsulated in a life of internal conflict that leaves him struggling to merely live, yet alone be there for others. In his quest for peace, he finds surrender to be his one confidante and friend. In examining the question, “is Hamlet a hero?” the answer lies in the conflict that remains within his inner core, his egotistical ways, the absence of bravery and his surrendering to destiny, which makes him far from heroic.



In the second paragraph, the phrase “brooding in the past” is used. What does this phrase MOST LIKELY mean?

352. Was Hamlet a Hero?

Hamlet is a literary work that people from all facets of life have at least heard of. This seventeenth century play encompasses the life of Hamlet, the prince of Denmark. His dramatic life is narrated throughout the pages of William Shakespeare’s play. In creating such a work, Shakespeare created a character that had the potential, power, and authority to serve as a hero among his people; nonetheless, this contradictory man seems too distraught to truly embellish and illustrate the definition of a true hero. In brief, Hamlet signifies a persona that is quite different from the typical hero. Rather than being a noble and courageous man, this prince of Denmark is unrepresentative of the admirable qualities that heroes typically reflect. Hamlet’s internal conflicts, selfish behaviors, absence of courage, and eventual surrender to death make him arguably a simple man, unworthy of the title of hero.
Hamlet struggles with immense internal conflicts that create overwhelming and unbearable pain. This madness is displayed in Hamlet’s cruel response to Ophelia, a woman that he has once loved: “I have heard of your paintings well enough / God hath given you one face, / and you make yourselves another, you jig, / you amble, and you lisp,” (III, i ,144-148). Prior to this Hamlet had intentionally pursued Ophelia, but his inability to move beyond his father’s death leaves him struggling to maintain any degree of stability. Throughout the play, others seek to encourage Hamlet, but he maintains distance from those around him, brooding on the past. It is this reluctance to move beyond his father’s death that causes Hamlet to remain entrapped in a sea of internal despair that hinders the role as the hero that his ancestry intended for him to be. Rather than a hero, Hamlet is a man tortured by internal desolation.
Equally important, Hamlet displays inconsistent behaviors that are contradictory to heroism. He hates partying, drinking, and dancing, as he recognizes that these attributes lead to inaction, and says to his friend Horatio: “They clepe us drunkards, and with swinish phrase, /Soil our addition, and indeed it takes, / From our achievements, though perform’d at height,/ The pith and marrow of our attribute,” (I, iv, 19-22). Certainly, the recognition that such actions do hinder progress depicts Hamlet as a wise hero, but this illustration is short-lived when Hamlet uses his strong anger towards his mother (who married his uncle Claudius soon after his father’s demise) as an excuse to reject and deny his lover Ophelia. While there are brief glimmers of heroism revealed in the behaviors of Hamlet, most actions are reflective of his inner turmoil and his inability to truly behave as a hero to those around him.
Compared to the true hero, Hamlet lacks the courage needed to perform selfless actions. Instead, Hamlet is the opposite of courageous, seeking excuses to delay his killing of Claudius, even though he is taunted by reminders of his late father, who appears as a ghost to urge him to avenge his death. While Hamlet reaches the point of hating anything that defines Claudius, he never attains the courage needed to destroy the man that has symbolically destroyed him. If Hamlet were truly a hero, he would find a way to vindicate his father by following the wishes of the ghost that visits him. Instead, Hamlet remains a captive of the murder that he wants to commit but cannot find the courage to do. This is certainly representative of his non-heroic state.
Similarly, Hamlet surrenders in a way that is not indicative of heroism. He feels compelled to surrender his life to destiny. While Hamlet’s ultimate recognition that he has no real control of his own life allows him to gain some resemblance of peace, it is evidence of weakness that does not embody the heroic mindset. Heroes strive for control and supremacy, which is quite the opposite of his inability to act in response to his father’s death. Rather than seeking to reflect knowledge and legacy, he allows himself to be reduced to an individual lacking the knowledge to lead and protect others. It is this absence of knowledge that makes him unable to claim the title of hero. It is Hamlet’s ultimate surrender to the world around him that leads readers to see the extent of how contrary he is to heroism.
In looking at the life of Hamlet, one sees the reflection of a man that has the ancestry, the placement, and the ability to be a hero to his people. Unfortunately, he is encapsulated in a life of internal conflict that leaves him struggling to merely live, yet alone be there for others. In his quest for peace, he finds surrender to be his one confidante and friend. In examining the question, “is Hamlet a hero?” the answer lies in the conflict that remains within his inner core, his egotistical ways, the absence of bravery and his surrendering to destiny, which makes him far from heroic.



What role does Ophelia play in Hamlet’s life?

353. Was Hamlet a Hero?

Hamlet is a literary work that people from all facets of life have at least heard of. This seventeenth century play encompasses the life of Hamlet, the prince of Denmark. His dramatic life is narrated throughout the pages of William Shakespeare’s play. In creating such a work, Shakespeare created a character that had the potential, power, and authority to serve as a hero among his people; nonetheless, this contradictory man seems too distraught to truly embellish and illustrate the definition of a true hero. In brief, Hamlet signifies a persona that is quite different from the typical hero. Rather than being a noble and courageous man, this prince of Denmark is unrepresentative of the admirable qualities that heroes typically reflect. Hamlet’s internal conflicts, selfish behaviors, absence of courage, and eventual surrender to death make him arguably a simple man, unworthy of the title of hero.
Hamlet struggles with immense internal conflicts that create overwhelming and unbearable pain. This madness is displayed in Hamlet’s cruel response to Ophelia, a woman that he has once loved: “I have heard of your paintings well enough / God hath given you one face, / and you make yourselves another, you jig, / you amble, and you lisp,” (III, i ,144-148). Prior to this Hamlet had intentionally pursued Ophelia, but his inability to move beyond his father’s death leaves him struggling to maintain any degree of stability. Throughout the play, others seek to encourage Hamlet, but he maintains distance from those around him, brooding on the past. It is this reluctance to move beyond his father’s death that causes Hamlet to remain entrapped in a sea of internal despair that hinders the role as the hero that his ancestry intended for him to be. Rather than a hero, Hamlet is a man tortured by internal desolation.
Equally important, Hamlet displays inconsistent behaviors that are contradictory to heroism. He hates partying, drinking, and dancing, as he recognizes that these attributes lead to inaction, and says to his friend Horatio: “They clepe us drunkards, and with swinish phrase, /Soil our addition, and indeed it takes, / From our achievements, though perform’d at height,/ The pith and marrow of our attribute,” (I, iv, 19-22). Certainly, the recognition that such actions do hinder progress depicts Hamlet as a wise hero, but this illustration is short-lived when Hamlet uses his strong anger towards his mother (who married his uncle Claudius soon after his father’s demise) as an excuse to reject and deny his lover Ophelia. While there are brief glimmers of heroism revealed in the behaviors of Hamlet, most actions are reflective of his inner turmoil and his inability to truly behave as a hero to those around him.
Compared to the true hero, Hamlet lacks the courage needed to perform selfless actions. Instead, Hamlet is the opposite of courageous, seeking excuses to delay his killing of Claudius, even though he is taunted by reminders of his late father, who appears as a ghost to urge him to avenge his death. While Hamlet reaches the point of hating anything that defines Claudius, he never attains the courage needed to destroy the man that has symbolically destroyed him. If Hamlet were truly a hero, he would find a way to vindicate his father by following the wishes of the ghost that visits him. Instead, Hamlet remains a captive of the murder that he wants to commit but cannot find the courage to do. This is certainly representative of his non-heroic state.
Similarly, Hamlet surrenders in a way that is not indicative of heroism. He feels compelled to surrender his life to destiny. While Hamlet’s ultimate recognition that he has no real control of his own life allows him to gain some resemblance of peace, it is evidence of weakness that does not embody the heroic mindset. Heroes strive for control and supremacy, which is quite the opposite of his inability to act in response to his father’s death. Rather than seeking to reflect knowledge and legacy, he allows himself to be reduced to an individual lacking the knowledge to lead and protect others. It is this absence of knowledge that makes him unable to claim the title of hero. It is Hamlet’s ultimate surrender to the world around him that leads readers to see the extent of how contrary he is to heroism.
In looking at the life of Hamlet, one sees the reflection of a man that has the ancestry, the placement, and the ability to be a hero to his people. Unfortunately, he is encapsulated in a life of internal conflict that leaves him struggling to merely live, yet alone be there for others. In his quest for peace, he finds surrender to be his one confidante and friend. In examining the question, “is Hamlet a hero?” the answer lies in the conflict that remains within his inner core, his egotistical ways, the absence of bravery and his surrendering to destiny, which makes him far from heroic.



Near the end of the passage, the author says that Hamlet “remains a captive of the murder that he wants to commit but cannot find the courage to do. ”What does this MOST LIKELY mean?

354. Was Hamlet a Hero?

Hamlet is a literary work that people from all facets of life have at least heard of. This seventeenth century play encompasses the life of Hamlet, the prince of Denmark. His dramatic life is narrated throughout the pages of William Shakespeare’s play. In creating such a work, Shakespeare created a character that had the potential, power, and authority to serve as a hero among his people; nonetheless, this contradictory man seems too distraught to truly embellish and illustrate the definition of a true hero. In brief, Hamlet signifies a persona that is quite different from the typical hero. Rather than being a noble and courageous man, this prince of Denmark is unrepresentative of the admirable qualities that heroes typically reflect. Hamlet’s internal conflicts, selfish behaviors, absence of courage, and eventual surrender to death make him arguably a simple man, unworthy of the title of hero.
Hamlet struggles with immense internal conflicts that create overwhelming and unbearable pain. This madness is displayed in Hamlet’s cruel response to Ophelia, a woman that he has once loved: “I have heard of your paintings well enough / God hath given you one face, / and you make yourselves another, you jig, / you amble, and you lisp,” (III, i ,144-148). Prior to this Hamlet had intentionally pursued Ophelia, but his inability to move beyond his father’s death leaves him struggling to maintain any degree of stability. Throughout the play, others seek to encourage Hamlet, but he maintains distance from those around him, brooding on the past. It is this reluctance to move beyond his father’s death that causes Hamlet to remain entrapped in a sea of internal despair that hinders the role as the hero that his ancestry intended for him to be. Rather than a hero, Hamlet is a man tortured by internal desolation.
Equally important, Hamlet displays inconsistent behaviors that are contradictory to heroism. He hates partying, drinking, and dancing, as he recognizes that these attributes lead to inaction, and says to his friend Horatio: “They clepe us drunkards, and with swinish phrase, /Soil our addition, and indeed it takes, / From our achievements, though perform’d at height,/ The pith and marrow of our attribute,” (I, iv, 19-22). Certainly, the recognition that such actions do hinder progress depicts Hamlet as a wise hero, but this illustration is short-lived when Hamlet uses his strong anger towards his mother (who married his uncle Claudius soon after his father’s demise) as an excuse to reject and deny his lover Ophelia. While there are brief glimmers of heroism revealed in the behaviors of Hamlet, most actions are reflective of his inner turmoil and his inability to truly behave as a hero to those around him.
Compared to the true hero, Hamlet lacks the courage needed to perform selfless actions. Instead, Hamlet is the opposite of courageous, seeking excuses to delay his killing of Claudius, even though he is taunted by reminders of his late father, who appears as a ghost to urge him to avenge his death. While Hamlet reaches the point of hating anything that defines Claudius, he never attains the courage needed to destroy the man that has symbolically destroyed him. If Hamlet were truly a hero, he would find a way to vindicate his father by following the wishes of the ghost that visits him. Instead, Hamlet remains a captive of the murder that he wants to commit but cannot find the courage to do. This is certainly representative of his non-heroic state.
Similarly, Hamlet surrenders in a way that is not indicative of heroism. He feels compelled to surrender his life to destiny. While Hamlet’s ultimate recognition that he has no real control of his own life allows him to gain some resemblance of peace, it is evidence of weakness that does not embody the heroic mindset. Heroes strive for control and supremacy, which is quite the opposite of his inability to act in response to his father’s death. Rather than seeking to reflect knowledge and legacy, he allows himself to be reduced to an individual lacking the knowledge to lead and protect others. It is this absence of knowledge that makes him unable to claim the title of hero. It is Hamlet’s ultimate surrender to the world around him that leads readers to see the extent of how contrary he is to heroism.
In looking at the life of Hamlet, one sees the reflection of a man that has the ancestry, the placement, and the ability to be a hero to his people. Unfortunately, he is encapsulated in a life of internal conflict that leaves him struggling to merely live, yet alone be there for others. In his quest for peace, he finds surrender to be his one confidante and friend. In examining the question, “is Hamlet a hero?” the answer lies in the conflict that remains within his inner core, his egotistical ways, the absence of bravery and his surrendering to destiny, which makes him far from heroic.



Which of the following does the author highlight as one of Hamlet’s positive attributes?

355. Hippocrates (c. 460-c. 370 B. C. ). The Oath and Law of Hippocrates.
The Harvard Classics. 1909-14.

The Oath of Hippocrates

I SWEAR by Apollo the physician and Æsculapius, and Health, and All-heal, and all the gods and goddesses, that, according to my ability and judgment, I will keep this Oath and this stipulation-to reckon him who taught me this Art equally dear to me as my parents, to share my substance with him, and relieve his necessities if required; to look upon his offspring in the same footing as my own brothers, and to teach them this Art, if they shall wish to learn it, without fee or stipulation; and that by precept, lecture, and every other mode of instruction, I will impart a knowledge of the Art to my own sons, and those of my teachers, and to disciples bound by a stipulation and oath according to the law of medicine, but to none others. I will follow that system of regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous. I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel; and in like manner I will not give to a woman a pessary to produce abortion. With purity and with holiness I will pass my life and practice my Art. I will not cut persons labouring under the stone, but will leave this to be done by men who are practitioners of this work. Into whatever houses I enter, I will go into them for the benefit of the sick, and will abstain from every voluntary act of mischief and corruption; and, further, from the seduction of females or males, of freemen and slaves. Whatever, in connection with my professional practice, or not in connection with it, I see or hear, in the life of men, which ought not to be spoken of abroad, I will not divulge, as reckoning that all such should be kept secret. While I continue to keep this Oath unviolated, may it be granted to me to enjoy life and the practice of the Art, respected by all men, in all times. But should I trespass and violate this Oath, may the reverse be my lot.



The main idea of this passage can best be surmised as: