PracticeQuiz content is free on an ad-supported model.
Unfortunately, we can't support ad blocker usage because of the impact on our servers. If you'd like to continue, please disable your ad blocker and reload page.
16.Sheila is a paralegal who works for Paul, an attorney representing the plaintiff in a commercial-litigation case. As requested by Paul, a subpoena was issued and served on Ruf-n-Tuf Chainsaw Company, a third party to the lawsuit. Paul is only interested in the correspondence, including e-mail, between employees of Ruf-n-Tuf and the defendant. The subpoena set a deposition for Ruf-n-Tuf’s custodian of records for September 15, but included a standard letter stating that the deposition will not be necessary if Ruf-n-Tuf provides copies of the correspondence as requested. Is it necessary in this situation for Sheila to arrange for a court reporter just in case Ruf-n-Tuf would prefer an actual deposition?