Practice Quiz

Paralegal Exam Prep - Question List

Select how would you like to study

Study Mode Free Daily Question Test Mode
326. During a manslaughter trial, Juror Jenny was very impressed with the defense attorney's case. She decided to call him and let him know that he did a great job. While she spoke to several employees of the defense attorney's law firm, she was never able to speak to the defense attorney. Juror Jenny then emailed him. The defendant was acquitted. The prosecutor later learned of Juror Jenny's contact with the defense attorney during the trial. What may be a consequence of Juror Jenny's actions?
  1. Nothing, because it is not wrong to compliment an attorney.
  2. Nothing, because the defense attorney never spoke to Juror Jenny.
  3. The members of the jury will be polled to make sure that they were all in agreement on the verdict.
  4. The jury will be ordered to deliberate again with an alternate juror taking the place of Juror Jenny.
  5. The jury verdict may be set aside.
See answer
327. Brian and Bradley are art thieves. Together they steal artwork from stores, museums, and private residences. They have an oral agreement to evenly split money they receive from selling the stolen art. Without telling Bradley, Brian sold a painting for $5,000. He did not give Bradley any of the money. Brian discovered the transaction and based on their agreement, demanded $2,500. Can Bradley successfully sue Brian?
  1. Yes. Brian breached the contract.
  2. No. The contract is not enforceable, as it is against public policy.
  3. No. The contract is subject to the State of Frauds and should have been in writing.
  4. No, because Bradley would have to admit to the crimes related to stealing the art.
  5. Yes, but only if Bradley can show that there had been no changes to the terms to their agreement.
See answer

Select how would you like to study

Study Mode Free Daily Question Test Mode