ASVAB Paragraph Comprehension - Question List

Select how would you like to study

16. "The California Right to Know Genetically Modified Food Act” known as Proposition 37 will require food manufacturers to label food with genetically modified ingredients (GMOs). If the bill passes, it will be the first law in the United States that required GMO labeling. Some European countries already mandate GMO labeling, but efforts to pass legislation in the United States have met resistance. Over a dozen other states have failed to pass proposed labeling laws. Food manufacturer argue that the bill is unnecessary because GMO are safe. They believe labeling will drive up food costs and will confuse consumers. Proponents of the legislation assert that consumers have a right to know what is in their food, and some people believe that the genetic modification of foods effects safety. Corporations that produce genetically modified foods point to hundreds of studies that show that they are safe. California voters will soon make a choice about GMO foods labels, and both sides are spending millions of dollars to influence their decisions. The result of the ballot initiative will reverberate throughout the nation.

Why have people initiated the effort to pass Proposition 37 and require genetically modified foods be labeled?
  1. Genetically modified foods are much cheaper, and consumers should be aware of the lower cost.
  2. Genetically modified foods are completely safe and labeling will point that out.
  3. Genetically modified foods are confusing for consumers and labels will add clarity.
  4. Some believe genetically modified foods are less safe than convention foods.
17. "The California Right to Know Genetically Modified Food Act” known as Proposition 37 will require food manufacturers to label food with genetically modified ingredients (GMOs). If the bill passes, it will be the first law in the United States that required GMO labeling. Some European countries already mandate GMO labeling, but efforts to pass legislation in the United States have met resistance. Over a dozen other states have failed to pass proposed labeling laws. Food manufacturer argue that the bill is unnecessary because GMO are safe. They believe labeling will drive up food costs and will confuse consumers. Proponents of the legislation assert that consumers have a right to know what is in their food.

If Proposition 37 in California passes, what precedent will be established?
  1. Proposition 37 will represent the first time regular citizens have created and voted on a law.
  2. Proposition 37 will be the first law passed regarding food safety in California.
  3. Proposition 37 will be the first law in the United States requiring GMO labeling.
  4. Proposition 37 will be the most expensive law ever developed and passed in the United States.
18. "The California Right to Know Genetically Modified Food Act” known as Proposition 37 will require food manufacturers to label food with genetically modified ingredients (GMOs). If the bill passes, it will be the first law in the United States that required GMO labeling. Some European countries already mandate GMO labeling, but efforts to pass legislation in the United States have met resistance. Over a dozen other states have failed to pass proposed labeling laws. Food manufacturer argue that the bill is unnecessary because GMO are safe. They believe labeling will drive up food costs and will confuse consumers. Proponents of the legislation assert that consumers have a right to know what is in their food.

How many other states have tried to pass GMO labeling laws?
  1. California is the first state to try to pass a GMO labeling law.
  2. More than a dozen other states have tried to pass GMO labeling laws.
  3. Ten states in the United States currently have GMO labeling laws.
  4. Records are not maintained regarding what states have initiated GMO labeling laws.
19. "The California Right to Know Genetically Modified Food Act” known as Proposition 37 will require food manufacturers to label food with genetically modified ingredients (GMOs). If the bill passes, it will be the first law in the United States that required GMO labeling. Some European countries already mandate GMO labeling, but efforts to pass legislation in the United States have met resistance. Over a dozen other states have failed to pass proposed labeling laws. Food manufacturer argue that the bill is unnecessary because GMO are safe. They believe labeling will drive up food costs and will confuse consumers. Proponents of the legislation assert that consumers have a right to know what is in their food.

Based on past efforts to legally require GMO labeling in other states, what can be inferred about the public’s concern with GMOs?
  1. The public is very concerned with GMOs and is attempting to draw attention to their use in food.
  2. The public does not understand the dangers of GMOs and is not making rational decisions about labeling.
  3. The public is easily misled by large corporations and is making uninformed choices.
  4. The public is not overwhelmingly concerned with GMOs and has not required labeling in any states thus far.
20. "The California Right to Know Genetically Modified Food Act” known as Proposition 37 will require food manufacturers to label food with genetically modified ingredients (GMOs). If the bill passes, it will be the first law in the United States that required GMO labeling. Some European countries already mandate GMO labeling, but efforts to pass legislation in the United States have met resistance. Over a dozen other states have failed to pass proposed labeling laws. Food manufacturer argue that the bill is unnecessary because GMO are safe. They believe labeling will drive up food costs and will confuse consumers. Proponents of the legislation assert that consumers have a right to know what is in their food. California voters will soon make a choice about GMO foods labels, and both sides are spending millions of dollars to influence their decisions. The result of the ballot initiative will reverberate throughout the nation.

How do proponents of Proposition 37 in California hope their efforts will compare to those of advocates of GMO labeling in other states?
  1. California advocates hope they will be as successful as advocates in other states.
  2. California advocates hope successes in other states will create momentum for their efforts in California.
  3. California advocates hope they will have more money to campaign than their counterparts in other states have had.
  4. California advocates hope they will be more successful than advocates in other states.

Select how would you like to study