PracticeQuiz content is free on an ad-supported model.
Unfortunately, we can't support ad blocker usage because of the impact on our servers. If you'd like to continue, please disable your ad blocker and reload page.
In recent years, United States policy toward China has been confused. China is the world's most populous country and a major military power, and has become an increasingly valuable trading partner. It has been the view of Presidents, therefore, that it is in the United States interest to remain on good terms with the Beijing government. However, the human rights situation in China shows few signs of improving. In addition, the end of the Cold War has made the political logic of a close relationship with China less compelling. The trade relationship has been, to put it mildly, strained. The Chinese leadership has not responded to quiet diplomacy. It is, therefore, time to reconsider our relationship and break off diplomatic relations with China.
- The Madison Daily News
One disadvantage of following the recommendations in the editorial is that:
"It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. . . . A law repugnant to the constitution is void."
In Marbury v. Madison (1803), quoted above, the Supreme Court argued that it had the authority to:
"It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. . . . A law repugnant to the constitution is void."
The decision in Marbury v. Madison, quoted above, argues that the judiciary should serve as:
The Second World War marked the most substantial change ever in the context in which United States foreign policy is made. The world that emerged after the war had fundamentally changed in economic, political, and military ways. These changes made the world a more dangerous place, and altered the demands placed on foreign policy.
The statement calls the world after the Second World War "a more dangerous place." What specific change could one cite to support this claim?
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States . . . are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
The Fourteenth Amendment, quoted above, was intended to ensure that: